🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive action to restrict social media access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate worldwide. Officials, campaigners, and families are monitoring intently to see if this strategy will set a precedent for the rest of the world.

European Trend

Throughout Europe, a increasing number of countries are considering parallel restrictions.

• Denmark has announced a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the leader stating that mobile devices and networks are "stealing our children's youth". The policy is expected to be formalized soon.
• The Norwegian government is set to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard the young from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to authenticate the age and identity of social media account holders. The media minister have stated that an Australia-style ban is "one of the measures under consideration".
• In Spain, the leader has urged the legislature to pass a bill raising the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a related move, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has advised parents to block their children from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has approved a advisory motion demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 without a parent decides otherwise is granted. Although it highlights of the "habit-forming" design of these services, the move does not create binding law.

"An effective age barrier is a solid first step," stated one European lawmaker driving the initiative.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Stance

In the UK, the government has remained open to a potential ban, stating that "no measure is off the table" but insisting any policy must be "based on conclusive research".

Last year, interest built behind a proposal to enact controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately weakened. Instead, the administration committed to conduct more studies the topic.

Charities have voiced apprehensions. A prominent charity established by the relatives of a girl who took her own life after being exposed to harmful online content suggests that a simple age ban may not make platforms safer and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of harm when users reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a response to the inability of the tech sector to create tools that are safe and fit for children," commented a influential child protection advocate.

The US: A State-by-State Approach

In the United States, action is largely occurring at the local government level amid country-wide stalemate.

• Utah requires parental consent for under-18s to use social media and controls overnight use.
• Florida has passed a law barring children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a law limiting minors to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with additional use requiring a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly introduced bills requiring parental consent for teenagers to set up social media presences.

Even with widespread concern and proposals from some individuals to follow Australia's example, a federal ban is currently seen as improbable.

International Perspectives

Outside of the West, other nations are also exploring options.

• Malaysia plans to prohibit social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• Brazil has increased the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, global organizations take a more cautious stance. The UN children's agency has warned that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "could backfire". The body points out that the internet can be a "critical link" for isolated youth and that government action should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to improve child safeguards.

While this international discussion continues, the actions of this nation and its followers demonstrate that states around the world are no longer prepared to stand by for platforms to self-regulate.